Despite their great mass, the length-time 'photons', as virtual entities, are proposed to establish a 'freefall state' for orbiting electrons, within a reference frame not exceeding 10^-17 cm. This would be similar to virtual electrons/positrons and photons, altering other properties of real particles, in the formal theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED). In this view, the lobelike complexity of electron orbits would stem from oscillations of the length and time variables, confined within a ~10^-17 cm. warp 'bubble' that acts like a cavity resonator. A stable electron orbit would, consequently, be synchronized with the continually changing amplitudes and orientations of the virtual warp fields so the electron remains in freefall, giving rise to complex orbital patterns.

Atoms can emit or absorb radiation spontaneously, or be stimulated to do so by an external agency. Thus one might wonder if, during the emission or absorption process, the presumed momentary disengagement of the length-time 'photons' from their function of shielding electrons (and quarks) from angular acceleration could lead to coupling with the terrestrial gravity field. For this to happen, the micro-warp fields of millions of these virtual quanta would need to be in spatial alignment, and all at the same phase in their wave cycle. An additional requirement would be for the emission or absorption process to be prolonged beyond the few pico-seconds that characterizes orbital transitions.

The first two requirements might be satisfied by the coherence conditions intrinsic to superconductors. The third requirement might be achieved by external "pumping" to produce a population inversion as in a laser, so that the electrons are continuously transitioning between orbits. In this respect, it's interesting to note that Evgeny Podkletnov claimed up to 2% shielding of the Earth's field in a high temperature superconductor irradiated with micro-waves. Since this postulated gravity mimicking field is 39 magnitudes stronger than Newtonian gravity, 2% of Earth gravity would correspond to only 2 parts in 10⁴¹ of the full strength of this field. Unfortunately, reputable labs have been unable to replicate Podkletnov's results, using much more sensitive equipment. On the other hand, recent work at a major research center in Austria has produced structurally different acceleration fields around a type-1 superconductor.

In March of 2006 physicists at the Austrian Research Center (ARC), in Seibersdorf, Austria published a report summarizing the detection of acceleration fields, as large as 277 micro g's, in proximity to a Type-1 superconductor. Hundreds of experimental runs were conducted over a 3 year period. The group theorize that they have detected a gravitoelectric (GE) field induced by a changing gravitomagnetic (GM) field. To create the changing GM field, a niobium ring 6 mm thick, 15 mm high, and 144 mm in diameter, was spun up from 0 to 6500 rpm in one second. This corresponds to a tangential acceleration at the ring's rim of 108 meters/sec², or 11 G's. The 3-axis in-ring accelerometer positioned 33 mm from the inner edge of the ring typically detected a tangential acceleration of 100 micro-g's opposing the applied acceleration.

Quick Overview

A natural Alcubierre-Broeck microwarp field, ranging to 10^-16 cm., and originating from a virtual supersymmetry quanta, is conjectured to underlie a key aspect of the quantum phenomenology. Since the 1st quarter of the 20th century it has been known that the stability of atoms derives from the wave nature of matter. Louis deBroglie showed that the condition for stability stems from the requirement that electrons be constrained to orbits containing an integral number of wavelengths, given by Planck's constant h divided by the electron's momentum. Just how an electron's matter wave negates the classical expectation of radiative collapse, following from angular accelerations 39 magnitudes too large to be compensated by a geodesic orbit, is an unsolved puzzle.

Until recently, the possibility that matter waves could have a gravitational basis could not even be contemplated, since no known mechanism could impart a gravitational type coupling, of the necessary strength, to rival the Coulomb force - a force 39 magnitudes larger than Newtonian gravity. This situation has now changed with the remarkable postulate of "extra dimensions" that would boost the strength of the gravitational interaction at a distance of around 10^-17 cm. (or equivalently 1 TeV), to the level of the electroweak and strong forces. The result is the unification of all nature's forces would occur at the supersymmetry scale, rather than the traditional Planck scale (10^-33 cm.). An important implication of these ideas is that some supersymmetry quanta should be endowed with strong gravity coupling properties that match, or exceed, the Coulomb force.

The underlying premise of supersymmetry is that the equations of the Standard Model should remain unaltered if the force and matter particles (bosons and fermions, respectively) exchange places. This exchange results in the creation of a set of massive superpartners that complement the Standard Model particles, uniting bosons and fermions into a single superfamily. In the new multiplet, bosons acquire non-integer spin, while fermions adopt integer spin - the converse of their status in the Standard Model. But, aside from mass and spin, how does the exchange of fermionic and bosonic properties manifest itself? In particular, how does it affect the structure of the superpartners fields relative to the structure of the fields of the Standard Model particles?

A clue to how the supersymmetry operation may transform the structure of the superpartners fields is very likely contained within the framework of the Standard Model itself. In the early decades of the 20th century the renowned British physicist Paul Dirac made two important predictions that deal with fundamental symmetry translations in matter: 1) That every particle has a counterpart with opposite charge and/or spin, and 2) That quantized units of magnetic charge might exist. The first prediction has been abundantly demonstrated, while the second prediction forms an integral feature of all modern unified field theories, including string theory.

In both types of matter the relevant symmetry can be described as a role transposition. In antimatter, there is a role transposition of electric charge vs a vs normal matter: e. g. positive electron (positron), negative proton (antiproton). In magnetic monopoles, there is a role exchange of the variables of Maxwell's unified electromagnetic field. In a magnetic monopole the electric field adopts the dipole structure normally assumed by the magnetic field in ordinary matter, while the magnetic field takes on the unipolar structure normally presented by the electric field in ordinary matter. The role transposition apparent between magnetic monopoles and ordinary electric charges is technically known as a duality of the electromagnetic field.

Plausibly, the symmetries embodied in antimatter and magnetic monopoles represent a trend of progressively more complex symmetries of this type that extend to the supersymmetry regime. Extrapolating the duality concept to the unified superforce, the logical result should be an exchange of variables between the constituent forces of the superforce - in effect, role transpositions writ large with a richer, more complex, structure. Since the constituents of the superforce represent both bosonic and fermionic fields, the inescapable conclusion is that the expanded duality and the supersymmetry operation are one and the same process. Assuming this to be the case, the nature of the superpartners fields becomes quantifiable, and the manner in which the superpartners interact with normal matter, and their associated fields, can be given more concrete form.

A clear precondition for an exchange of variables between the different forces of the superforce is that each force contain the same number of variables. Since the superforce energy is above the electroweak synthesis energy, there are only three forces comprising the superforce - strong force, electroweak force, and gravity. Without going into detail, it can be shown that each of these forces can be characterized by a triad of primary variables and a triad of secondary variables that internally relate to one another via local gauge symmetries (see "Field Interchange Hypothesis"). This equalization of variables rationalizes the role transpositions between the forces. If we regard the exchange of variables between one pair of these constituent forces as one permutation, there are exactly six permutations with three elements - N!, where N=3. Curiously, this matches the number of subtheories embraced within M-theory, the framework for superstring theory. To be continued....This is a test. checking for system variables.

Common Structure of the Maxwell and GEM Equations Given Planck units.

ι = 1 (Maxwell) or -1 (GEM). Impulse Generator Coupling Factor To derive the coupling factor for the impulse generator... {\mathcal A}(x_i\to x_f) = \int {\mathcal D}x(t) \exp(iS[x(t)]/\hbar)